{"id":18640,"date":"2026-02-19T12:13:08","date_gmt":"2026-02-19T12:13:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/su.edu.ye\/cd\/?p=18640"},"modified":"2026-02-23T21:26:02","modified_gmt":"2026-02-23T21:26:02","slug":"masters-degree-awarded-to-ms-marsala-hajar-in-orthodontics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/su.edu.ye\/cd\/en\/18640\/","title":{"rendered":"Master\u2019s Degree Awarded to Ms. Marsala Hajar in Orthodontics"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

Ms. Marsala Qasem Hassan Hajar \u200e<\/strong> was awarded a Master\u2019s Degree in Orthodontics <\/strong>for her thesis titled: Canine Retraction Using NITI Closed Coil Spring Vs. Memory Rastomerie Chain: A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial<\/em><\/strong>, <\/em>which was submitted to the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry \u2013 Sana\u2019a University. The MA defense was held on Thursday, February 12, 2026.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The MA Viva-voce Committee, which was formed based on a resolution issued by the Graduate Studies and Scientific Research Council, consisted of the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/strong><\/td>\nCommittee Members<\/strong><\/td>\nDesignation<\/strong><\/td>\nPosition<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nProf. Ghamdan Abdullah Al-Harazi \u200e<\/strong><\/td>\nInternal Examiner<\/td>\nChair<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nProf. Khaled Abdulsalam Al-Haddad<\/strong><\/td>\nMain Supervisor<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nProf. Yasser Ali Ahmed Thabet \u200e<\/strong><\/td>\nExternal Examiner<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The study aimed to compare memory elastic chains and nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil springs during canine retraction in a split-mouth clinical trial, evaluating the following parameters:<\/p>\n

I: Retraction Efficacy<\/strong>
\nCalculation of the rate of canine movement (mm\/month) during space closure.<\/p>\n

II: Apical Root Resorption<\/strong>
\nAssessment of the severity of apical root resorption using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).<\/p>\n

III: Pain Perception<\/strong>
\nMeasured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess self-reported pain levels.<\/p>\n

IV: Canine Rotation<\/strong>
\nMeasurement of tooth rotation around its long axis during movement.<\/p>\n

V: Canine Angulation<\/strong>
\nEvaluation of canine positioning, whether tipping movement or full bodily movement.<\/p>\n

The comparative clinical study reached the following key findings:<\/p>\n

Functional Efficiency (Retraction Rate):<\/strong>
\nBoth NiTi closed coil springs and memory elastic chains demonstrated very similar effectiveness in the rate of space closure, with no statistically significant difference in canine displacement over six months.<\/p>\n

Control of Tooth Movement (Rotation & Angulation):<\/strong>
\nBoth methods showed excellent and sufficient control of canine rotation, with no significant adverse change in either system.
\nNiTi closed coil springs demonstrated superior mechanical performance in reducing canine tipping, providing movement closer to full bodily tooth movement compared to elastic chains, which showed greater tipping tendency.<\/p>\n

Tissue Safety (Root Resorption):<\/strong>
\nUse of NiTi springs was associated with lower levels of apical root resorption (approximately 0.48 mm) compared to elastic chains, although resorption in both systems remained clinically mild.<\/p>\n

Patient Experience (Pain Perception):<\/strong>
\nMemory elastic chains were superior in terms of patient comfort, recording significantly lower pain levels during the first two months of treatment.<\/p>\n

In light of these findings, the researcher provided the following clinical recommendations:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Monitoring Root Resorption:<\/strong> Careful monitoring of apical root resorption is essential, especially when using memory elastic chains.<\/li>\n
  • Torque Control Application:<\/strong> Implement torque control measures to minimize canine tipping during retraction.<\/li>\n
  • Selection Criteria for Treatment Method:<\/strong> The decision between springs and chains should be based on the biomechanical requirements of the case rather than pain levels alone.<\/li>\n
  • Effectiveness and Biological Considerations:<\/strong> Both systems are effective for canine retraction, but potential biological effects such as root health and tooth alignment must be considered when planning treatment.<\/li>\n
  • Need for Future Research:<\/strong> Further studies are recommended to evaluate anchorage loss using larger samples and longer follow-up periods.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    The defense session was attended by a number of professors, researchers, students, colleagues, and the researcher\u2019s family.<\/p>\n

    \"\" \"\" \"\" \"\" \"\" \"\"<\/p>\n