{"id":23308,"date":"2026-07-20T16:35:15","date_gmt":"2026-07-20T13:35:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/su.edu.ye\/voga\/?p=23308"},"modified":"2026-07-20T16:44:46","modified_gmt":"2026-07-20T13:44:46","slug":"masters-degree-awarded-to-ms-huda-al-baadani-in-arabic-studies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/su.edu.ye\/voga\/en\/23308\/","title":{"rendered":"Master\u2019s Degree Awarded to Ms. Huda Al-Baadani in Arabic Studies"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ms. Huda Ali Ahmed Mohammed Al-Baadani \u200e<\/strong>was awarded a Master\u2019s Degree in Arabic Studies <\/strong>with an average of excellent and a grade of (95) for her thesis titled: Preferences and Objections in Al-Muharrar fi Al-Nahw by Umar ibn Isa ibn Ismail Al-Harami (d. 702 AH): A Descriptive Syntactic Study<\/em><\/strong>, <\/em>which was submitted to the Department of Arabic Studies, Faculty of Education \u2013 Sana\u2019a University. The MA defense was held on Tuesday, June 30, 2026\u200e\u200e.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The MA Viva-voce Committee, which was formed based on a resolution issued by the Graduate Studies and Scientific Research Council, consisted of the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/strong><\/td>\nCommittee Members<\/strong><\/td>\nDesignation<\/strong><\/td>\nPosition<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nAssoc. Prof.<\/strong> Wafaa Mohammed Ali Al-Ghurbani<\/strong><\/td>\nInternal Examiner<\/td>\nChair<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nProf. Abdullah Ahmed Hamzah Al-Nahari<\/strong><\/td>\nMain Supervisor<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nAssoc. Prof.<\/strong> Hamoud Nasser Ali Nassar<\/strong><\/td>\nExternal Examiner<\/td>\nMember<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

The thesis aimed to:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Examine Al-Harami’s preferences and objections in the areas of declinable and indeclinable forms and morphological issues.<\/li>\n
  • Identify the principles and rules upon which he based his syntactic preferences and objections.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    The study findings revealed that Al-Harami exhibited a strong inclination toward the Basran school of syntax and was not merely a transmitter of the views of earlier grammarians; rather, he possessed an independent scholarly personality characterized by critical reasoning in preference and objection. The study further showed that his methodology was founded on the four principal sources of Arabic syntax: transmitted linguistic evidence (Sama<\/em>), analogy (Qiyas<\/em>), consensus (Ijma<\/em>), and the presumption of continuity (Istishab Al-hal<\/em>). It also highlighted the nature of his reasoning in preference and objection, aimed at ensuring the compatibility of grammatical rules with eloquent Arabic usage while preserving grammatical analogy.<\/p>\n

    In light of these findings, the researcher recommended the following:\u200e<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Conducting further scholarly studies on the terminology of preference and objection among Arabic grammarians, particularly with regard to its semantics and usage.<\/li>\n
    • Undertaking a study of the morphological level in Al-Muharrar fi Al-Nahw<\/em>, focusing on structure and usage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      The defense session was attended by a number of academics, researchers, students, colleagues, and the researcher\u2019s family.<\/p>\n

      \"\" \"\" \"\"<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n