Master’s Degree for Researcher Ibrahim Abdulmughni from the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Commerce

Researcher Ibrahim Ali Abdulmughni earned a Master’s degree with honors and a 93% grade in from the Department of Political Science, majoring in Public Administration, Faculty of Commerce and Economics at Sana’a University.
His thesis was titled “The Impact of Administrative Leadership on Administrative Performance in Yemeni Public Universities: A Case Study of 21 September University of Medical and Applied Sciences”.
The Viva took place on Sunday, 9/9/1446 AH, corresponding to 9/3/2025 AD.
The Viva discussion and judgment committee consisted of:
* Prof. Dr. Abdulkarim Abdullah Al-Rawdhi, Main Supervisor and Committee Member.
* Professor Dr. Abdulhadi Al-Hamdani, Internal Examiner and Committee Chairperson.
* Associate Professor Hamid Al-Mekhlafi, External Examiner and Committee Member.
The thesis aimed to identify the impact of administrative leadership on the administrative performance of employees in Yemeni public universities, with 21 September University as a model.
The study objectives included:
* Highlighting the level of impact of administrative leadership on the administrative performance of employees in Yemeni public universities, specifically 21 September University of Medical and Applied Sciences.
* Understanding the reality of administrative performance at 21 September University of Medical and Applied Sciences among employees and administrative leaders.
* Determining the type of impact of leadership skills on the level of administrative performance of employees at 21 September University of Medical and Applied Sciences.
* Determining the type of impact of leadership qualities on the level of administrative performance at 21 September University of Medical and Applied Sciences.
* Identifying the level of application of administrative leadership in its dimensions (leadership skills and leadership qualities).
* Determining the level of administrative performance in its dimensions (efficiency and effectiveness).
To achieve the study objectives and determine the results, a questionnaire consisting of 40 statements was designed as a data collection tool and distributed randomly to 100 individuals from the university’s employee population of 135. All 100 questionnaires were returned (100%). The descriptive analytical method was used, followed by data processing and analysis.
The researcher came out with several results and recommendations, including:
First: key findings:
* The level of application of skills by the leadership is high and positively affects the level of administrative performance.
* The administrative leadership possesses the necessary leadership qualities to positively influence employees and administrative performance.
* Most university employees demonstrate efficiency and effectiveness in performing administrative tasks, indicating high job performance at the university.
* Most employees hold university degrees, reflecting the university’s emphasis on a qualified academic staff.
Second: Key Recommendations:
* Adopting Islamic principles and ethics in leadership.
* Appointing and selecting leaders with positive leadership qualities.
* Leadership should focus on achieving harmony and cohesion among employees.
* Developing training programs for managers in administrative leadership and leadership skills, and measuring their impact on job performance and on the employees personally.
* Developing tools and methods for providing services to clients.
* Ensuring fairness in the use of reward and punishment authority, and appointments.
* Adopting and implementing training and qualification plans to develop the university’s staff in all administrative areas.
* Increasing trust between the leader and all employees, and listening to them attentively.
* Providing a suitable work environment technologically and materially.
* Providing a sense of job security and stability for employees.
* Paying attention to subordinates with qualifications.
A number of academics, researchers, students, interested individuals, the researcher’s colleagues, and family members attended the discussion.
Previous post